Icon Twitter Icon Facebook Icon Linkedin Icon Arrow Icon Calendar Icon Location Icon Phone Icon Mail Icon Person Icon Close Icon Download Icon Folder Icon Dashboard Black Icon Dashboard Blue Icon Download Black Icon Download Blue Icon Info Black Icon Info Blue Icon Book Black Icon Book Blue Icon Logout Black Icon Logout Blue Icon Network Black Icon Network Blue Icon Secured Black Icon Secured Blue Icon Person Black Icon Person Blue Icon Group Blue Icon Group Black Icon Library Blue Icon Library Black Icon Graduate_cap black Icon Graduate_cap blue Icon eu_flag Blue Icon eu_flag Black Icon Email Icon Play Icon Play icon Icon download-big Icon updated
News 10 Apr 2025

Case C-440/23: Pleading in front of the Court of Justice of the EU regarding the German rules on online casinos and the bet on lotteries

court2.jpeg

On 9 April 2025, the Court of Justice of the EU heard the pleadings of the parties and the Member States in the case on the reference for a preliminary ruling regarding the interpretation of Article 56 TFUE concerning national (German) gambling regulations. The reference is asked by the court Prim’Awla tal-Qorti Ċivili (Malta) about the compatibility with EU law of the German monopoly on lotteries and the former prohibition of online casinos (State treaty).

The case involves an application for reimbursement of stakes lost by an individual on the secondary lotteries offered in Germany for which the private (Maltese) operators did not have a licence, and in particular, the compatibility of the German regime prohibiting unlicensed online bet on lotteries with Article 56 TFEU.

In that case, on the one hand, a question arises as to the admissibility of the preliminary question C-440/23, since it was raised by a Maltese judge in the context of a legal dispute between a German lawyer who bought recovery claims against Lottoland (‘European Lotto and Betting Ltd Deutsche Lotto Und Sportwetten Limited’) from a player who is also domiciled in Germany. 

On the other hand, the Court have to examine the distinction between a lottery organised by the State and a bet with a private organiser regulated in another Member State on the result of that same State lottery (so-called ‘secondary’ lottery) and on the justification of the German regulations on online casinos and lotteries under Union law.

In addition, the Court should indicate whether German law (before 1 July 2021) was compatible with EU law in that the exclusion of any organisers from obtaining a licence to organise online bets on lotteries was justified on consumer protection grounds.

The opinion of the Advocate General in this case shall be published on 10th July 2025.

court of justice EU

Philippe Vlaemminck, Managing Partner of Vlaemminck.law and EL Legal Advisor was joined by Beata Guzik, Director of Public Affairs and Valentin Ramognino, Associate Lawyer at Vlaemminck. Philippe recalled the social dimension of the public lotteries, as mentione in a recent article by Koen Lenaerts, President of the Court of Justice of the EU. 

Link to the case